SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Perry Group

Other Business continuity vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Perry Group does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 11 that differ from Perry Group on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Perry Group has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Perry Group does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Perry Group does notPerry Group publishes, and they do not
Cutovercutover.com 30/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Origami Riskorigamirisk.com 17/100 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Crises Controlcrises-control.com 23/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
KingsBridgekingsbridgebcp.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Databarracksdatabarracks.com 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Rockdoverockdovesolutions.com 16/100 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Protechtprotechtgroup.com 14/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ncontractsncontracts.com 13/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Cammscammsgroup.com 13/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Continuity2continuity2.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Crisis24crisis24.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Bryghtpathbryghtpath.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.