Transparency alternatives to Total Party Planner
Other Catering and event management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Total Party Planner. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from Total Party Planner on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Total Party Planner has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Total Party Planner” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Total Party Planner | Found at Total Party Planner, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fourthfourth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fourth | 74/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Event Templeeventtemple.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Event Temple | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Momentusgomomentus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Momentus | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| FoodStormfoodstorm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FoodStorm | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| HoneyBook Eventshoneybook.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HoneyBook Events | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Perfect Venueperfectvenue.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Perfect Venue | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Catereasecaterease.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Caterease | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Craftablecraftable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Craftable | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Planning Podplanningpod.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planning Pod | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Prismmprismm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Prismm | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Tripleseattripleseat.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tripleseat | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| CaterZencaterzen.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CaterZen | 17/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.