Transparency alternatives to Almac Clinical
Other Clinical trial software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Almac Clinical. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 33 that differ from Almac Clinical on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Almac Clinical has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Almac Clinical” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Almac Clinical | Found at Almac Clinical, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenClinicaopenclinica.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenClinica | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| 4G Clinical4gclinical.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 4G Clinical | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Suvodasuvoda.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Suvoda | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| TrialKitcrucialdatasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrialKit | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Florenceflorencehc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Florence | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Advarraadvarra.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Advarra | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Antidoteantidote.meSee also Transparency alternatives to Antidote | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Datatrakdatatrak.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Datatrak | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| EnrollNowenrollnow.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to EnrollNow | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Threadthreadresearch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Thread | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Cluepointscluepoints.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cluepoints | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Viedocviedoc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Viedoc | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.