SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to RealTime eClinical

Other Clinical trial software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at RealTime eClinical. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 33 that differ from RealTime eClinical on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

RealTime eClinical has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at RealTime eClinical” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at RealTime eClinicalFound at RealTime eClinical, not found there
4G Clinical4gclinical.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 4G Clinical 30/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
OpenClinicaopenclinica.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenClinica 30/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
TrialKitcrucialdatasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrialKit 30/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Florenceflorencehc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Florence 26/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Suvodasuvoda.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Suvoda 30/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Advarraadvarra.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Advarra 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Antidoteantidote.meSee also Transparency alternatives to Antidote 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Datatrakdatatrak.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Datatrak 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
EnrollNowenrollnow.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to EnrollNow 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Threadthreadresearch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Thread 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Cluepointscluepoints.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cluepoints 22/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Trialdatatrialdata.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Trialdata 22/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.