Transparency alternatives to Exoscale
Other Cloud hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Exoscale. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from Exoscale on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Exoscale has 1 gap in what we could measure: Subprocessor list. The column “Found there, not found at Exoscale” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Exoscale | Found at Exoscale, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kinstakinsta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kinsta | 70/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| DigitalOceandigitalocean.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DigitalOcean | 65/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 4 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Fly.iofly.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Fly.io | 39/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 8 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +5 | Compare |
| Renderrender.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Render | 74/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Vercelvercel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vercel | 65/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Railwayrailway.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Railway | 52/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Aptibleaptible.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aptible | 48/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| Cloudflarecloudflare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cloudflare | 48/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Hetznerhetzner.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hetzner | 48/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Scalewayscaleway.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scaleway | 48/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| UpCloudupcloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to UpCloud | 43/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 6 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | Compare |
| Herokuheroku.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Heroku | 39/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.