SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Heroku

Other Cloud hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Heroku does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Heroku on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Heroku has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Heroku does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Heroku does notHeroku publishes, and they do not
Exoscaleexoscale.com 87/100 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 nothing Compare
Kinstakinsta.com 70/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
DigitalOceandigitalocean.com 75/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Vercelvercel.com 65/100 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare
Cloudwayscloudways.com 33/100 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Renderrender.com 70/100 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Cloudflarecloudflare.com 65/100 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Certifications named Compare
Aptibleaptible.com 55/100 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Data location stated Compare
Hetznerhetzner.com 50/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Scalewayscaleway.com 45/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
WP Enginewpengine.com 45/100 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Fly.iofly.io 55/100 1 Subprocessor list 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.