Transparency alternatives to Kinsta
Other Cloud hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Kinsta. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from Kinsta on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Kinsta has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Kinsta” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Kinsta | Found at Kinsta, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exoscaleexoscale.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Exoscale | 87/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Renderrender.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Render | 74/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Railwayrailway.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Railway | 52/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Hetznerhetzner.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hetzner | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Herokuheroku.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Heroku | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| MacStadium Orkamacstadium.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MacStadium Orka | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | Compare |
| AccelByte Gaming Servicesaccelbyte.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to AccelByte Gaming Services | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | Compare |
| Clever Cloudclever-cloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clever Cloud | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| DigitalOceandigitalocean.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DigitalOcean | 65/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Vercelvercel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vercel | 65/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Scalewayscaleway.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scaleway | 48/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| UpCloudupcloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to UpCloud | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.