Alternatives to IONOS Cloud
Other Cloud hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that IONOS Cloud does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from IONOS Cloud on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
IONOS Cloud has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and IONOS Cloud does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and IONOS Cloud does not | IONOS Cloud publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exoscaleexoscale.com | 87/100 | 9 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +6 | nothing | Compare |
| Vercelvercel.com | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| DigitalOceandigitalocean.com | 75/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Netlifynetlify.com | 57/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Railwayrailway.com | 52/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Kinstakinsta.com | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Renderrender.com | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Aptibleaptible.com | 55/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Fly.iofly.io | 55/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Cloudflarecloudflare.com | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Herokuheroku.com | 50/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| UpCloudupcloud.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.