Alternatives to T Cloud Public
Other Cloud hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that T Cloud Public does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from T Cloud Public on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
T Cloud Public has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and T Cloud Public does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and T Cloud Public does not | T Cloud Public publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exoscaleexoscale.com | 87/100 | 9 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +6 | nothing | Compare |
| DigitalOceandigitalocean.com | 75/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Kinstakinsta.com | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Renderrender.com | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Vercelvercel.com | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Cloudflarecloudflare.com | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Aptibleaptible.com | 55/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Netlifynetlify.com | 57/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Fly.iofly.io | 55/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Herokuheroku.com | 50/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Hetznerhetzner.com | 50/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Scalewayscaleway.com | 45/100 | 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.