SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Fracttal

Other Maintenance management (CMMS) vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Fracttal does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Fracttal on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Fracttal has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Fracttal does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Fracttal does notFracttal publishes, and they do not
MaintainXgetmaintainx.com 30/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Infraspeakinfraspeak.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Limblelimble.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Accruentaccruent.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
Cryotoscryotos.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
Fiixfiixsoftware.com 30/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare
ServiceChannelservicechannel.com 30/100 1 Data processing agreement nothing Compare
eMaintemaint.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Click Maintclickmaint.com 21/100 1 Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
eWorkOrderseworkorders.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
FTMaintenanceftmaintenance.com 13/100 1 Data location stated 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
NEXGENnexgenam.com 13/100 1 Data location stated 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.