SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to RhineRiver

Other Maintenance management (CMMS) vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at RhineRiver. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 48 that differ from RhineRiver on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

RhineRiver has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at RhineRiver” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at RhineRiverFound at RhineRiver, not found there
Fiixfiixsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fiix 35/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
UpKeepupkeep.comSee also Transparency alternatives to UpKeep 35/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Infraspeakinfraspeak.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Infraspeak 30/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Limblelimble.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Limble 30/100 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
MaintainXgetmaintainx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MaintainX 30/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Accruentaccruent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Accruent 30/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
ServiceChannelservicechannel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ServiceChannel 30/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Asset Infinityassetinfinity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Asset Infinity 22/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Cenoscocenosco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cenosco 22/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ultimoultimo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ultimo 22/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
GEOMAGIC GeoNAMgeomagic.deSee also Transparency alternatives to GEOMAGIC GeoNAM 17/100 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
eMaintemaint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to eMaint 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.