SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to CodeGPT

Other Coding assistants vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that CodeGPT does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 14 that differ from CodeGPT on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

CodeGPT has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and CodeGPT does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and CodeGPT does notCodeGPT publishes, and they do not
Factoryfactory.ai 74/100 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 nothing Compare
Poolsidepoolside.ai 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 1 Public pricing Compare
Cognitioncognition.com 43/100 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 1 Public pricing Compare
Augment Codeaugmentcode.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Cursorcursor.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Zedzed.dev 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Magicmagic.dev 39/100 4 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Roomoteroomote.dev 35/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Kilokilo.ai 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Qodoqodo.ai 39/100 3 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Tabninetabnine.com 13/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Clinecline.bot 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.