Transparency alternatives to Keel
Other Compliance automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Keel. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 59 that differ from Keel on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Keel has 3 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Keel” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Keel | Found at Keel, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vantavanta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vanta | 57/100 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Secureframesecureframe.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Secureframe | 83/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Whisticwhistic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Whistic | 48/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| UpGuardupguard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to UpGuard | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | Compare |
| Trusterotrustero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trustero | 35/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Conveyorconveyor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conveyor | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Cypagocypago.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cypago | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Onspringonspring.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Onspring | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Trustcloudtrustcloud.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Trustcloud | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| SecurityScorecardsecurityscorecard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SecurityScorecard | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| AIDXaidxtech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AIDX | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
| Ciqualiaciqualia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ciqualia | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.