SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Onspring

Other Compliance automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Onspring does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Onspring on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Onspring has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Onspring does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Onspring does notOnspring publishes, and they do not
Bitsightbitsight.com 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 1 Status page with history Compare
Vantavanta.com 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 nothing Compare
LogicGatelogicgate.com 55/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Status page with history Compare
UpGuardupguard.com 52/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Hyperproofhyperproof.io 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Akitraakitra.com 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Certacerta.ai 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Conveyorconveyor.com 43/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Kertoskertos.io 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Optrooptro.ai 30/100 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Archerarcherirm.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Cyberpionionix.io 17/100 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.