Transparency alternatives to Vanta
Other Compliance automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Vanta. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 59 that differ from Vanta on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Vanta has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Vanta” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Vanta | Found at Vanta, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secureframesecureframe.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Secureframe | 83/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Keelkeelgrc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Keel | 78/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Hyperproofhyperproof.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Hyperproof | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | Compare |
| Whisticwhistic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Whistic | 57/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Certacerta.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Certa | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| ProcessUnityprocessunity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ProcessUnity | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Optrooptro.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Optro | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | Compare |
| Unified Complianceunifiedcompliance.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unified Compliance | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 7 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +4 | Compare |
| LogicGatelogicgate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LogicGate | 55/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Trusterotrustero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trustero | 35/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Conveyorconveyor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conveyor | 30/100 | 1 Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| Kertoskertos.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Kertos | 30/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.