SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Kabandy

Other Construction estimating vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Kabandy does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 37 that differ from Kabandy on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Kabandy has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Kabandy does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Kabandy does notKabandy publishes, and they do not
HCSShcss.com 45/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Countfirecountfire.com 39/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
STACKstackct.com 26/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Drawer AIdrawer.ai 26/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
ConstructConnectconstructconnect.com 22/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Togal.AItogal.ai 22/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Cubitbuildsoft.com.au 17/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Joistjoist.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
McCormick Systemsmccormicksys.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
MeasureSquaremeasuresquare.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
PlanSwiftplanswift.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
RSMeansrsmeans.com 30/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.