Transparency alternatives to HCSS
Other Construction estimating vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at HCSS. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 36 that differ from HCSS on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
HCSS has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at HCSS” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at HCSS | Found at HCSS, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Countfirecountfire.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Countfire | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Kabandykabandy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kabandy | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| RSMeansrsmeans.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RSMeans | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Knowifyknowify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Knowify | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Drawer AIdrawer.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Drawer AI | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| STACKstackct.comSee also Transparency alternatives to STACK | 26/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list | Compare |
| ConstructConnectconstructconnect.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ConstructConnect | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Togal.AItogal.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Togal.AI | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Acrualacrual.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Acrual | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Buildernbuildern.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Buildern | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Clear Estimatesclearestimates.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clear Estimates | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Cubitbuildsoft.com.auSee also Transparency alternatives to Cubit | 17/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.