SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Chainguard

Other Container and cloud workload security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Chainguard does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 17 that differ from Chainguard on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Chainguard has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Chainguard does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Chainguard does notChainguard publishes, and they do not
Upwindupwind.io 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Socketsocket.dev 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Docker Scoutdocker.com 43/100 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Endor Labsendorlabs.com 39/100 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Sweet Securitysweet.security 17/100 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Anchoreanchore.com 26/100 1 Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
Prisma Cloudprismacloud.io 26/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Nirmatanirmata.com 22/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Armoarmosec.io 9/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Kubexkubex.ai 4/100 1 Certifications named 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Cast AIcast.ai 22/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Public pricing Compare
Isovalentisovalent.com 22/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.