Alternatives to Endor Labs
Other Container and cloud workload security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Endor Labs does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 17 that differ from Endor Labs on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Endor Labs has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Endor Labs does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Endor Labs does not | Endor Labs publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Socketsocket.dev | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Upwindupwind.io | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Docker Scoutdocker.com | 43/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Chainguardchainguard.dev | 30/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Anchoreanchore.com | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Nirmatanirmata.com | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Kubexkubex.ai | 4/100 | 1 Certifications named | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Prisma Cloudprismacloud.io | 26/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Cast AIcast.ai | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Isovalentisovalent.com | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sweet Securitysweet.security | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Armoarmosec.io | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.