SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Upwind

Other Container and cloud workload security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Upwind does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 17 that differ from Upwind on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Upwind has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Upwind does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Upwind does notUpwind publishes, and they do not
Docker Scoutdocker.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 Compare
Socketsocket.dev 48/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Endor Labsendorlabs.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named Compare
Chainguardchainguard.dev 30/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Prisma Cloudprismacloud.io 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Nirmatanirmata.com 22/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Anchoreanchore.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 Compare
Cast AIcast.ai 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Isovalentisovalent.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Sweet Securitysweet.security 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 Compare
Fairwindsfairwinds.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Falcofalco.org 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.