SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to QuickSilk

Other Content management systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that QuickSilk does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 40 that differ from QuickSilk on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

QuickSilk has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and QuickSilk does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and QuickSilk does notQuickSilk publishes, and they do not
Sanitysanity.io 78/100 9 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +6 nothing Compare
Storyblokstoryblok.com 74/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +4 nothing Compare
Directusdirectus.io 52/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 1 Data location stated Compare
Contentstackcontentstack.com 57/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Pantheonpantheon.io 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Uniformuniform.dev 43/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
CloudCannoncloudcannon.com 35/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
Craft CMScraftcms.com 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Shorthandshorthand.com 39/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Strapistrapi.io 39/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
ButterCMSbuttercms.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Kontent.aikontent.ai 26/100 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.