Transparency alternatives to Bugherd
Other Creative review and approval vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Bugherd. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 41 that differ from Bugherd on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Bugherd has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Bugherd” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Bugherd | Found at Bugherd, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balsamiqbalsamiq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Balsamiq | 77/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Marker.iomarker.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Marker.io | 74/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Sketchsketch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sketch | 61/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Atarimatarim.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Atarim | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | Compare |
| Userbackuserback.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Userback | 57/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Marvelmarvelapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Marvel | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Frame.ioframe.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Frame.io | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | Compare |
| Ziflowziflow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ziflow | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | Compare |
| Approval Studioapproval.studioSee also Transparency alternatives to Approval Studio | 39/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Flowmappflowmapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flowmapp | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Moqupsmoqups.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Moqups | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
| Overflowoverflow.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Overflow | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.