Named privacy contact in Developer collaboration and CI
"Contact us" is not a privacy contact. A named officer or a dedicated address is.
3 of 12 vendors we measured here publish it, that is 25%. Last checked 2026-09-02.
25% here against 42% across every category we measure. Developer collaboration and CI sits below the overall share for this criterion.
Back to Named privacy contact across all categories, or to Developer collaboration and CI.
Published
A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| CircleCI | https://circleci.com/legal/privacy/ |
| Codacy | https://www.codacy.com/privacy |
| CodeRabbit | https://www.coderabbit.ai/privacy-policy |
No named privacy contact found.
We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Aviator | 7 addresses checked |
| Blacksmith | 7 addresses checked |
| Buddy | 7 addresses checked |
| Buildkite | 7 addresses checked |
| Codeberg | 7 addresses checked |
| Codeclimate | 7 addresses checked |
| Codefresh | 7 addresses checked |
| Coder | 7 addresses checked |
| DevPod | 7 addresses checked |
Not measured
We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.
None. Every vendor here was measured for this criterion.
Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.