SaaS Ranking

Named privacy contact in Monitoring and observability

"Contact us" is not a privacy contact. A named officer or a dedicated address is.

16 of 46 companies we measured here publish it, that is 35%. Last checked 2026-10-18.

35% here against 36% across every category we measure. Monitoring and observability sits below the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Named privacy contact across all categories, or to Monitoring and observability.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found16
  • Not found at checked addresses30
  • Not measured3

49 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

VendorWhat we found
Chronosphere https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/legal-notices/privacyChecked
Datadog https://www.datadoghq.com/legal/privacy/Checked
Dynatrace https://www.dynatrace.com/company/trust-center/privacy/Checked
Elastic https://www.elastic.co/legal/privacy-statementChecked
Grafana Labs https://grafana.com/legal/privacy-policy/Checked
Honeycomb https://www.honeycomb.io/privacyChecked
Middleware https://middleware.io/privacy-policy/Checked
Netdata https://www.netdata.cloud/privacy/Checked
New Relic https://newrelic.com/termsandconditions/privacy?has_gdpr=trueChecked
OnlineOrNot https://onlineornot.com/privacyChecked
Pingdom https://www.solarwinds.com/legal/privacyChecked
Pulsetic https://pulsetic.com/privacy/Checked
Pydantic https://pydantic.dev/legal/privacy-policyChecked
Rollbar https://docs.rollbar.com/docs/privacy-policyChecked
StatusGator https://statusgator.com/privacyChecked
Sumo Logic https://www.sumologic.com/legal/privacy-statementChecked
No named privacy contact found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Avada Q-Guard 7 addresses checkedChecked
Better Stack 7 addresses checkedChecked
Bugsnag 7 addresses checkedChecked
Checkly 7 addresses checkedChecked
Coralogix 7 addresses checkedChecked
Dash0 7 addresses checkedChecked
Enteros 7 addresses checkedChecked
Greptime 7 addresses checkedChecked
GridGain Control Center 7 addresses checkedChecked
HyperDX 7 addresses checkedChecked
Last9 7 addresses checkedChecked
Logz.io 7 addresses checkedChecked
Metoro 7 addresses checkedChecked
MonSpark 7 addresses checkedChecked
OneUptime 7 addresses checkedChecked
OpenObserve 7 addresses checkedChecked
Parseable 7 addresses checkedChecked
Raygun 7 addresses checkedChecked
Sazabi 7 addresses checkedChecked
Sematext 7 addresses checkedChecked
Sentry 7 addresses checkedChecked
ServicePilot 7 addresses checkedChecked
SigNoz 7 addresses checkedChecked
Site24x7 7 addresses checkedChecked
SpeedCurve 7 addresses checkedChecked
Splunk 7 addresses checkedChecked
StatusCake 7 addresses checkedChecked
UptimeRobot 7 addresses checkedChecked
Xitoring 7 addresses checkedChecked
Zabbix 7 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
CloudBolt StormForge The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Cronitor The vendor’s robots.txt excludes us from at least one of these addresses, so this was not measured.Checked
Graylog The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in Monitoring and observability

Named privacy contact in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.