SaaS Ranking
Menu

Daytona

daytona.io · Developer collaboration and CI · checked 2026-09-13

61/100CBand C

Rank 6 of 55 in Developer collaboration and CI, where the median is 22.

We measured 12 of 12 criteria for Daytona on 2026-09-13. We found 7 with a source and did not find 5 at the addresses we checked. That is a transparency score of 61 out of 100, band C.

Overview

0 days since the newest finding, 0 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria measured in the last 30 days.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Daytona

daytona.io · Developer collaboration and CI

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
C 61of 100 Rank 6 of 55

Published commitments6 of 9 found

Measured behaviour1 of 3 found

Checked 2026-09-13. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

The evidence pack carries every criterion with its source, the addresses we checked, the date and the data snapshot id – the four things a procurement file needs and a screenshot loses. We do not issue badges: a badge is the first step towards a paid placement, and there is none here.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Daytona has no such document.

Where Daytona sits in Developer collaboration and CI

  1. A0 0%
  2. B4 7%
  3. C3 5%
  4. D3 5%
  5. E14 25%
  6. F31 56%
55 vendors with a score; 4 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Daytona is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What they state

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Subprocessor list

weight 3 of 3

No subprocessor list found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-09-13.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://daytona.io/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://daytona.io/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://daytona.io/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://daytona.io/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://daytona.io/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://daytona.io/privacy/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://daytona.io/legal/subprocessor-list – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Status page with history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-09-13.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.daytona.io/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://daytona.io/status – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://daytona.io.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

No third-party tracking before consent

weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-13.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://daytona.io/ – third-party requests before any interaction: cdn.zeroclick.ai, events.framer.com, fonts.gstatic.com, framer.com, framerusercontent.com, www.googletagmanager.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-09-13.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://daytona.io/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

✗

Named privacy contact

weight 1 of 3

We found this behind a sign-in, so it is not published openly.

Seen at https://www.daytona.io/privacy-policy · checked 2026-09-13

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://daytona.io/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://daytona.io/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://daytona.io/privacy-policy – found, but behind a sign-in
  4. https://daytona.io/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://daytona.io/legal/privacy-notice – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://daytona.io/trust/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://daytona.io/datenschutz – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 7
✓

Data processing agreement

weight 3 of 3

Published and readable without a login.

Source: https://www.daytona.io/dpa · checked 2026-09-13

✓

Data location stated

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording United States.
    Show the exact wording

    International Visitors Our Website is hosted in the United States.

    Read at https://www.daytona.io/privacy-policy

Source: https://www.daytona.io/privacy-policy · checked 2026-09-13

✓

Public pricing

weight 2 of 3

Actual numbers on a public page.

Source: https://www.daytona.io/pricing · checked 2026-09-13

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

  • HSTS max-age 31536000 seconds (365 days).
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=31536000

    Read at https://daytona.io/

Source: https://daytona.io/ · checked 2026-09-13

✓

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

The vendor commits publicly to giving notice before the list changes.

Source: https://www.daytona.io/dpa · checked 2026-09-13

✓

Certifications named

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page HIPAA, ISO/IEC 27001, SOC 2, SOC 2 Type II.
    Show the 4 exact wordings

    Compliance GDPR HIPAA SOC 2 ISO/IEC 27001 SOC 2 Type 1 SOC 2 Type 2 Documents All Public Private Get access Bulk download

    Read at https://trust.daytona.io/

    Compliance GDPR HIPAA SOC 2 ISO/IEC 27001 SOC 2 Type 1 SOC 2 Type 2 Documents All Public Private Get access Bulk download Featured Documents

    Read at https://trust.daytona.io/

    rs and prospects can request the full report through this trust center, where it sits alongside our SOC 2 Type I report and HIPAA attestation.

    Read at https://trust.daytona.io/

    Compliance GDPR HIPAA SOC 2 ISO/IEC 27001 SOC 2 Type 1 SOC 2 Type 2 Documents All Public Private Get access Bulk download Featu

    Read at https://trust.daytona.io/

Source: https://trust.daytona.io/ · checked 2026-09-13

✓

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

An availability commitment with a figure.

  • Highest uptime figure on that page 99.95 %.
    Show the exact wording

    Uptime Commitment Daytona will use commercially reasonable efforts to make the Services available 99.95% of the time in any given calendar month, excluding Excluded Downtime as defined below (“Uptime....

    Read at https://www.daytona.io/sla

Source: https://www.daytona.io/sla · checked 2026-09-13

History

Not enough completed runs yet to draw a line. The next runs fill this in.

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.