SaaS Ranking

Named privacy contact in Feature flags and experimentation

"Contact us" is not a privacy contact. A named officer or a dedicated address is.

8 of 16 vendors we measured here publish it, that is 50%. Last checked 2026-09-03.

50% here against 41% across every category we measure. Feature flags and experimentation sits above the overall share for this criterion.

Back to Named privacy contact across all categories, or to Feature flags and experimentation.

Published

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

VendorWhat we found
CloudBees https://www.cloudbees.com/legal/privacy-policy
Flagsmith https://www.flagsmith.com/privacy-policy
GrowthBook https://www.growthbook.io/legal/privacy-notice
Harness https://www.harness.io/legal/privacy
LaunchDarkly https://launchdarkly.com/privacy/
Optimizely https://www.optimizely.com/legal/privacy-notice
Split https://trust.harness.io/?utm_campaign=fme&utm_source=split_io&utm_medium=redirect&utm_content=wildcard
Statsig https://amplitude.com/privacy

No named privacy contact found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
ConfigCat 7 addresses checked
Convert 7 addresses checked
Crazy Egg 7 addresses checked
DevCycle 7 addresses checked
Eppo 7 addresses checked
Molasses 7 addresses checked
Monetate 7 addresses checked
Reflag 7 addresses checked

Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
AB Tasty The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.

Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.