SaaS Ranking

security.txt (RFC 9116) in Feature flags and experimentation

It tells a researcher where to report a vulnerability instead of guessing.

3 of 16 vendors we measured here publish it, that is 19%. Last checked 2026-09-03.

19% here against 13% across every category we measure. Feature flags and experimentation sits above the overall share for this criterion.

Back to security.txt (RFC 9116) across all categories, or to Feature flags and experimentation.

Published

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

VendorWhat we found
CloudBees https://www.cloudbees.com/.well-known/security.txt
ConfigCat https://configcat.com/.well-known/security.txt
DevCycle https://devcycle.com/.well-known/security.txt

No security.txt found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Convert 1 address checked
Crazy Egg 1 address checked
Eppo 1 address checked
Flagsmith 1 address checked
GrowthBook 1 address checked
Harness 1 address checked
LaunchDarkly 1 address checked
Molasses 1 address checked
Monetate 1 address checked
Optimizely 1 address checked
Reflag 1 address checked
Split 1 address checked
Statsig 1 address checked

Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
AB Tasty The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.

Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.