SaaS Ranking

Named privacy contact in Vulnerability management

"Contact us" is not a privacy contact. A named officer or a dedicated address is.

18 of 41 companies we measured here publish it, that is 44%. Last checked 2026-10-17.

44% here against 36% across every category we measure. Vulnerability management sits above the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Named privacy contact across all categories, or to Vulnerability management.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found18
  • Not found at checked addresses23
  • Not measured2

43 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

VendorWhat we found
Acunetix https://www.invicti.com/compliance/privacy-policyChecked
Aqua Security https://www.aquasec.com/privacy/Checked
Arnica https://www.arnica.io/legal/privacyChecked
Detectify https://detectify.com/privacy-policyChecked
HackerOne https://www.hackerone.com/policies/privacyChecked
Holm Security https://www.holmsecurity.com/privacy-policyChecked
Invicti https://www.invicti.com/compliance/privacy-policyChecked
JFrog https://jfrog.com/privacy-notice/Checked
Mend https://www.mend.io/privacy-policy/Checked
Orca Security https://orca.security/privacy-policy/Checked
Patchstack https://patchstack.com/privacy-policy/Checked
Rapid7 https://www.rapid7.com/privacy-policy/Checked
Snyk https://snyk.io/policies/privacy/Checked
StackHawk https://www.stackhawk.com/privacy-policy/Checked
Sucuri https://sucuri.net/privacy/Checked
Sysdig https://www.sysdig.com/legal/privacy-policyChecked
Vicarius https://www.vicarius.io/privacy-policyChecked
Wiz https://cloud.google.com/terms/cloud-acquisitions-privacy-notice?hl=en&e=0Checked
No named privacy contact found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Black Duck 7 addresses checkedChecked
Bright Security 7 addresses checkedChecked
Brinqa 7 addresses checkedChecked
Bugcrowd 7 addresses checkedChecked
Checkmarx 7 addresses checkedChecked
Cobalt 7 addresses checkedChecked
Cycode 7 addresses checkedChecked
Edgescan 7 addresses checkedChecked
Greenbone 7 addresses checkedChecked
Intigriti 7 addresses checkedChecked
Intruder 7 addresses checkedChecked
Legit Security 7 addresses checkedChecked
Nucleus Security 7 addresses checkedChecked
Ox Security 7 addresses checkedChecked
Pentera 7 addresses checkedChecked
Probely 7 addresses checkedChecked
Qualys 7 addresses checkedChecked
Reflectiz 7 addresses checkedChecked
Semgrep 7 addresses checkedChecked
SonarSource 7 addresses checkedChecked
Tenable 7 addresses checkedChecked
Veracode 7 addresses checkedChecked
YesWeHack 7 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Cymulate This vendor was not measured because our run stopped waiting for it.Checked
Outpost24 The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in Vulnerability management

Named privacy contact in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.