SaaS Ranking

security.txt (RFC 9116) in Vulnerability management

It tells a researcher where to report a vulnerability instead of guessing.

17 of 39 companies we measured here publish it, that is 44%. Last checked 2026-10-17.

44% here against 11% across every category we measure. Vulnerability management sits above the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to security.txt (RFC 9116) across all categories, or to Vulnerability management.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found17
  • Not found at checked addresses22
  • Not measured4

43 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

VendorWhat we found
Acunetix https://www.acunetix.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Bugcrowd https://bugcrowd.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Detectify https://detectify.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Greenbone https://www.greenbone.net/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Intigriti https://www.intigriti.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Invicti https://www.invicti.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
JFrog https://jfrog.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Nucleus Security https://nucleussec.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Orca Security https://orca.security/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Probely https://probely.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Qualys https://www.qualys.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Semgrep https://semgrep.dev/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Snyk https://snyk.io/.well-known/security.txtChecked
StackHawk https://www.stackhawk.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Tenable https://www.tenable.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Wiz https://www.wiz.io/.well-known/security.txtChecked
YesWeHack https://yeswehack.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
No security.txt found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Aqua Security 1 address checkedChecked
Arnica 1 address checkedChecked
Black Duck 1 address checkedChecked
Brinqa 1 address checkedChecked
Checkmarx 1 address checkedChecked
Cobalt 1 address checkedChecked
Cycode 1 address checkedChecked
Edgescan 1 address checkedChecked
HackerOne 1 address checkedChecked
Holm Security 1 address checkedChecked
Intruder 1 address checkedChecked
Legit Security 1 address checkedChecked
Ox Security 1 address checkedChecked
Patchstack 1 address checkedChecked
Pentera 1 address checkedChecked
Rapid7 1 address checkedChecked
Reflectiz 1 address checkedChecked
SonarSource 1 address checkedChecked
Sucuri 1 address checkedChecked
Sysdig 1 address checkedChecked
Veracode 1 address checkedChecked
Vicarius 1 address checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Bright Security The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Cymulate This vendor was not measured because our run stopped waiting for it.Checked
Mend The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Outpost24 The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in Vulnerability management

security.txt (RFC 9116) in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.