SaaS Ranking

Status page with history in Search and vector infrastructure

A status page without past incidents tells you nothing about reliability.

3 of 11 vendors we measured here publish it, that is 27%. Last checked 2026-09-02.

27% here against 29% across every category we measure. Search and vector infrastructure sits below the overall share for this criterion.

Back to Status page with history across all categories, or to Search and vector infrastructure.

Published

A public status page with incident history.

VendorWhat we found
Cludo https://status.cludo.com/
Nosto https://status.nosto.com/
Pinecone https://status.pinecone.io/

No public status page found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Addsearch 3 addresses checked
Chroma 3 addresses checked
Constructor 3 addresses checked
Dashworks 3 addresses checked
Findologic 3 addresses checked
Glean 3 addresses checked
Inbenta 3 addresses checked
Meilisearch 3 addresses checked

Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Algolia The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.

Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.