SaaS Ranking

Data processing agreement in Search and vector infrastructure

Without a published DPA you cannot review the contract before you talk to sales.

5 of 11 vendors we measured here publish it, that is 45%. Last checked 2026-09-02.

45% here against 14% across every category we measure. Search and vector infrastructure sits above the overall share for this criterion.

Back to Data processing agreement across all categories, or to Search and vector infrastructure.

Published

Published and readable without a login.

VendorWhat we found
Addsearch https://www.addsearch.com/legal/dpa/
Chroma https://www.trychroma.com/dpa
Constructor https://constructor.com/data-processing-agreement
Nosto https://www.nosto.com/legal/legacy-nosto-personalization-platform-terms/data-processing/
Pinecone https://www.pinecone.io/legal/data-processing-addendum/

No data processing agreement found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Cludo 8 addresses checked
Dashworks 8 addresses checked
Findologic 8 addresses checked
Glean 8 addresses checked
Inbenta 8 addresses checked
Meilisearch 8 addresses checked

Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Algolia The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.

Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.