SaaS Ranking

Subprocessor list in Content management systems

Naming the actual subprocessors is what turns a privacy promise into something you can check.

4 of 42 companies we measured here publish it, that is 10%. Last checked 2026-10-17.

10% here against 7% across every category we measure. Content management systems sits above the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Subprocessor list across all categories, or to Content management systems.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found4
  • Not found at checked addresses38
  • Not measured3

45 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

VendorWhat we found
Contentstack https://www.contentstack.com/legal/subprocessorsChecked
Craft CMS https://craftcms.com/subprocessorsChecked
Pantheon https://legal.pantheon.io/Checked
Storyblok https://www.storyblok.com/legal/subprocessorsChecked
No subprocessor list found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Builder.io 7 addresses checkedChecked
ButterCMS 7 addresses checkedChecked
CloudCannon 7 addresses checkedChecked
Cockpit 7 addresses checkedChecked
Concrete CMS 7 addresses checkedChecked
CoreMedia 7 addresses checkedChecked
Damibu Feeds 7 addresses checkedChecked
Decap CMS 7 addresses checkedChecked
Directus 7 addresses checkedChecked
Drupal 7 addresses checkedChecked
Enonic 7 addresses checkedChecked
FirstSpirit 7 addresses checkedChecked
Grav 7 addresses checkedChecked
Hygraph 7 addresses checkedChecked
Ibexa 7 addresses checkedChecked
Jadu Central 7 addresses checkedChecked
Joomla 7 addresses checkedChecked
Kentico 7 addresses checkedChecked
Keystone 7 addresses checkedChecked
Kontent.ai 7 addresses checkedChecked
Magnolia 7 addresses checkedChecked
OGGEH 7 addresses checkedChecked
Payload 7 addresses checkedChecked
Plasmic 7 addresses checkedChecked
Prismic 7 addresses checkedChecked
ProcessWire 7 addresses checkedChecked
Progress Sitefinity 7 addresses checkedChecked
QuickSilk 7 addresses checkedChecked
Sanity 7 addresses checkedChecked
Shorthand 7 addresses checkedChecked
Silverstripe 7 addresses checkedChecked
Statamic 7 addresses checkedChecked
Strapi 7 addresses checkedChecked
Tina 7 addresses checkedChecked
TYPO3 7 addresses checkedChecked
Umbraco 7 addresses checkedChecked
Uniform 7 addresses checkedChecked
Write.as 7 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Contentful The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
DatoCMS The vendor’s robots.txt excludes us from at least one of these addresses, so this was not measured.Checked
Squiz The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in Content management systems

Subprocessor list in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.