SaaS Ranking

Public pricing in Content management systems

Hidden pricing moves the first comparison into a sales call.

Put the published price in context: compare pricing models and estimate setup, renewal and exit with the SaaS cost calculator.

19 of 42 companies we measured here publish it, that is 45%. Last checked 2026-10-17.

45% here against 38% across every category we measure. Content management systems sits above the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Public pricing across all categories, or to Content management systems.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found19
  • Not found at checked addresses23
  • Not measured3

45 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

Actual numbers on a public page.

VendorWhat we found
Builder.io https://www.builder.io/pricing?_host=www.builder.ioChecked
ButterCMS https://buttercms.com/pricing/Checked
CloudCannon https://cloudcannon.com/pricing/Checked
Contentstack https://www.contentstack.com/pricingChecked
Craft CMS https://craftcms.com/pricingChecked
DatoCMS https://www.datocms.com/pricingChecked
Directus https://directus.com/pricingChecked
Enonic https://www.enonic.com/pricingChecked
Hygraph https://hygraph.com/pricingChecked
Plasmic https://www.plasmic.app/pricingChecked
Prismic https://prismic.io/pricingChecked
Sanity https://www.sanity.io/pricingChecked
Statamic https://statamic.com/pricingChecked
Storyblok https://www.storyblok.com/pricingChecked
Strapi https://strapi.io/pricing-cloudChecked
Tina https://tina.io/pricingChecked
Umbraco https://umbraco.com/pricingChecked
Uniform https://www.uniform.dev/pricingChecked
Write.as https://write.as/pricingChecked
No public pricing with figures found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Cockpit 5 addresses checkedChecked
Concrete CMS 5 addresses checkedChecked
CoreMedia 5 addresses checkedChecked
Damibu Feeds 5 addresses checkedChecked
Decap CMS 5 addresses checkedChecked
Drupal 5 addresses checkedChecked
FirstSpirit 5 addresses checkedChecked
Grav 5 addresses checkedChecked
Ibexa 5 addresses checkedChecked
Jadu Central 5 addresses checkedChecked
Joomla 5 addresses checkedChecked
Kentico 5 addresses checkedChecked
Keystone 5 addresses checkedChecked
Kontent.ai 5 addresses checkedChecked
Magnolia 5 addresses checkedChecked
OGGEH 5 addresses checkedChecked
Pantheon 5 addresses checkedChecked
Payload 5 addresses checkedChecked
ProcessWire 5 addresses checkedChecked
Progress Sitefinity 5 addresses checkedChecked
QuickSilk 5 addresses checkedChecked
Shorthand 5 addresses checkedChecked
TYPO3 5 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Contentful The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Silverstripe The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Squiz The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in Content management systems

Public pricing in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.