Public pricing in Content management systems
Hidden pricing moves the first comparison into a sales call.
2 of 9 vendors we measured here publish it, that is 22%. Last checked 2026-09-02.
22% here against 45% across every category we measure. Content management systems sits below the overall share for this criterion.
Back to Public pricing across all categories, or to Content management systems.
Published
Actual numbers on a public page.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Builder.io | https://www.builder.io/m/pricing |
| ButterCMS | https://buttercms.com/pricing/ |
No public pricing with figures found.
We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Cockpit | 5 addresses checked |
| Concrete CMS | 5 addresses checked |
| Contentstack | 5 addresses checked |
| CoreMedia | 5 addresses checked |
| Grav | 5 addresses checked |
| Progress Sitefinity | 5 addresses checked |
| TYPO3 | 5 addresses checked |
Not measured
We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Contentful | The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured. |
Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.