SaaS Ranking

security.txt (RFC 9116) in Content management systems

It tells a researcher where to report a vulnerability instead of guessing.

10 of 38 companies we measured here publish it, that is 26%. Last checked 2026-10-18.

26% here against 11% across every category we measure. Content management systems sits above the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to security.txt (RFC 9116) across all categories, or to Content management systems.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found10
  • Not found at checked addresses28
  • Not measured7

45 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

VendorWhat we found
Craft CMS https://craftcms.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
DatoCMS https://www.datocms.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Ibexa https://ibexa.ai/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Joomla https://www.joomla.org/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Kentico https://www.kentico.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Kontent.ai https://kontent.ai/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Sanity https://www.sanity.io/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Tina https://tina.io/.well-known/security.txtChecked
TYPO3 https://typo3.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
Umbraco https://umbraco.com/.well-known/security.txtChecked
No security.txt found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
ButterCMS 1 address checkedChecked
CloudCannon 1 address checkedChecked
Cockpit 1 address checkedChecked
Concrete CMS 1 address checkedChecked
Contentstack 1 address checkedChecked
CoreMedia 1 address checkedChecked
Damibu Feeds 1 address checkedChecked
Decap CMS 1 address checkedChecked
Directus 1 address checkedChecked
Drupal 1 address checkedChecked
Enonic 1 address checkedChecked
FirstSpirit 1 address checkedChecked
Hygraph 1 address checkedChecked
Jadu Central 1 address checkedChecked
Keystone 1 address checkedChecked
OGGEH 1 address checkedChecked
Pantheon 1 address checkedChecked
Payload 1 address checkedChecked
Plasmic 1 address checkedChecked
Prismic 1 address checkedChecked
Progress Sitefinity 1 address checkedChecked
QuickSilk 1 address checkedChecked
Shorthand 1 address checkedChecked
Statamic 1 address checkedChecked
Storyblok 1 address checkedChecked
Strapi 1 address checkedChecked
Uniform 1 address checkedChecked
Write.as 1 address checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Builder.io The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Contentful The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Grav The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Magnolia The vendor’s robots.txt excludes us from at least one of these addresses, so this was not measured.Checked
ProcessWire The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Silverstripe The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Squiz The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in Content management systems

security.txt (RFC 9116) in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.