Transparency alternatives to Blockchain Intelligence Group
Other Crypto compliance and blockchain analytics vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Blockchain Intelligence Group. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from Blockchain Intelligence Group on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Blockchain Intelligence Group has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Blockchain Intelligence Group” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Blockchain Intelligence Group | Found at Blockchain Intelligence Group, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CoinTrackingcointracking.infoSee also Transparency alternatives to CoinTracking | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Notabenenotabene.idSee also Transparency alternatives to Notabene | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Blockpitblockpit.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Blockpit | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Scorechainscorechain.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scorechain | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Ellipticelliptic.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Elliptic | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| TaxBittaxbit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TaxBit | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Crystal Intelligencecrystalintelligence.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crystal Intelligence | 26/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| 21 Analytics21analytics.coSee also Transparency alternatives to 21 Analytics | 13/100 | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| CoinLedgercoinledger.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to CoinLedger | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| Bitwavebitwave.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Bitwave | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Chainalysischainalysis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chainalysis | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Ledgibleledgible.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Ledgible | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.