Transparency alternatives to Hive
Other Data labelling vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Hive. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Hive on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Hive has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Hive” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Hive | Found at Hive, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scale AIscale.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scale AI | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| SuperAnnotatesuperannotate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SuperAnnotate | 57/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| HumanSignalhumansignal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HumanSignal | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| V7v7labs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to V7 | 43/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Tolokatoloka.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Toloka | 22/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Snorkelsnorkel.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Snorkel | 13/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Datasaurdatasaur.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Datasaur | 30/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Encordencord.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Encord | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| LXTlxt.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to LXT | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Labelboxlabelbox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Labelbox | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Roboflowroboflow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Roboflow | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Anolyticsanolytics.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Anolytics | 13/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.