Alternatives to Snorkel
Other Data labelling vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Snorkel does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Snorkel on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Snorkel has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Snorkel does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Snorkel does not | Snorkel publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scale AIscale.com | 65/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| SuperAnnotatesuperannotate.com | 57/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Datasaurdatasaur.ai | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| HumanSignalhumansignal.com | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Hivethehive.ai | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| CVATcvat.ai | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Dataloopdataloop.ai | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Roboflowroboflow.com | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kognickognic.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| V7v7labs.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Kilikili-technology.com | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| LXTlxt.ai | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.