Transparency alternatives to V7
Other Data labelling vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at V7. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from V7 on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
V7 has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at V7” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at V7 | Found at V7, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SuperAnnotatesuperannotate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SuperAnnotate | 57/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Scale AIscale.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scale AI | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| HumanSignalhumansignal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HumanSignal | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Hivethehive.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Hive | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Datasaurdatasaur.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Datasaur | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CVATcvat.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to CVAT | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Kilikili-technology.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kili | 26/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Appenappen.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Appen | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Kognickognic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kognic | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Labelboxlabelbox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Labelbox | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Snorkelsnorkel.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Snorkel | 13/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| iMeritimerit.netSee also Transparency alternatives to iMerit | 32/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.