Transparency alternatives to Convex
Other Data warehouses and databases vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Convex does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 41 that differ from Convex on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Convex has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Convex does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Convex does not | Convex publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aivenaiven.io | 78/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Supabasesupabase.com | 78/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| PlanetScaleplanetscale.com | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| SurrealDBsurrealdb.com | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Tiger Datatigerdata.com | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Weaviateweaviate.io | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Neonneon.tech | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Databricksdatabricks.com | 57/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Redisredis.io | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| MongoDB Atlasmongodb.com | 50/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| ScyllaDBscylladb.com | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| DoubleClouddouble.cloud | 35/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.