SaaS Ranking

DoubleCloud: what they publish

double.cloud · Data warehouses and databases · checked 2026-10-14

35/100EBand E

Rank 19 of 42 in Data warehouses and databases, where the median is 35.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-14. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

3 days since the newest dated result, 3 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

DoubleCloud

double.cloud · Data warehouses and databases

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
E 35of 100 Rank 19 of 42

Published commitments5 of 9 found

Measured behaviour0 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-14. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that DoubleCloud has no such document.

Where DoubleCloud sits in Data warehouses and databases

  1. A0 0%
  2. B2 5%
  3. C6 14%
  4. D6 14%
  5. E16 38%
  6. F12 29%
42 vendors with a score; 3 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of DoubleCloud is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What DoubleCloud states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

No data processing agreement found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-14.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://double.cloud/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://double.cloud/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://double.cloud/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://double.cloud/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://double.cloud/legal/data-processing-addendum – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://double.cloud/legal/gdpr – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://double.cloud/trust/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://double.cloud/privacy/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data processing agreement in Data warehouses and databases: 13 of 42 companies

✗

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

No statement about data location found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-10-14.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://double.cloud/security – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://double.cloud/trust – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://double.cloud/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://double.cloud/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://double.cloud/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://double.cloud/compliance – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://double.cloud/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data location stated in Data warehouses and databases: 8 of 42 companies

✗

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-10-14.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.double.cloud/ – The name "status.double.cloud" could not be resolved.
  2. https://double.cloud/status – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://double.cloud.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Status page with history in Data warehouses and databases: 12 of 43 companies

✗

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

No enforced HTTPS with HSTS found.

Checked 2 addresses on 2026-10-14.

Show the 2 addresses we checked
  1. http://double.cloud/ – redirects to https://double.cloud/
  2. https://double.cloud/ – no HSTS header

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Data warehouses and databases: 37 of 45 companies

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

  • Third-party hosts we saw on the first load 1 googletagmanager.com.
    Show the exact wording

    www.googletagmanager.com

    Read at https://double.cloud/

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-14.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://double.cloud/ – third-party requests before any interaction: www.googletagmanager.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in Data warehouses and databases: 2 of 44 companies

✗

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-14.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://double.cloud/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://double.cloud/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://double.cloud/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://double.cloud/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://double.cloud/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://double.cloud/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://double.cloud/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://double.cloud/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 200)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in Data warehouses and databases: 12 of 42 companies

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-14.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://double.cloud/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in Data warehouses and databases: 14 of 41 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 5
✓

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

The actual list is published, not just a promise to keep one.

Source: https://double.cloud/legal/sub-processors · checked 2026-10-14

Across the market: Subprocessor list in Data warehouses and databases: 9 of 42 companies

✓

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

Actual numbers on a public page.

Source: https://double.cloud/pricing · checked 2026-10-14

Across the market: Public pricing in Data warehouses and databases: 33 of 43 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page ISO/IEC 27001 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), ISO/IEC 27017 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), ISO/IEC 27018 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), PCI DSS (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), SOC 2 Type II (unclear from the sentence). The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 5 exact wordings

    ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Is an international security standard that lays out best practices for how organizations shoul

    Read at https://double.cloud/security

    ISO/IEC 27017:2015 Enhances cloud security by providing a dedicated standard for cloud service providers and user

    Read at https://double.cloud/security

    ISO/IEC 27018:2019 is a privacy standard tailored for cloud service providers, ensuring the protection of persona

    Read at https://double.cloud/security

    PCI DSS Is a security standard designed to ensure that all companies that accept, process, store or transmi

    Read at https://double.cloud/security

    Learn more SOC 2 Type II Audit assesses control design and implementation at a specific moment.

    Read at https://double.cloud/security

Source: https://double.cloud/security · checked 2026-10-14

Across the market: Certifications named in Data warehouses and databases: 26 of 42 companies

✓

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

An availability commitment with a figure.

  • Highest uptime figure on that page 100 %.
    Show the exact wording

    all Service Downtime periods in Accrual Period, divided by Maximum Service Uptime and multiplied on 100%.

    Read at https://double.cloud/legal/sla/

Source: https://double.cloud/legal/sla/ · checked 2026-10-14

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in Data warehouses and databases: 9 of 41 companies

✓

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

Source: https://double.cloud/legal/privacy · checked 2026-10-14

Across the market: Named privacy contact in Data warehouses and databases: 22 of 42 companies

History

100 0 2026-10-07: 35 of 1002026-10-14: 35 of 100 2026-10-07 2026-10-14
Score over the last 2 runs we measured DoubleCloud in: 35 (2026-10-07), 35 (2026-10-14).

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

DoubleCloud

5 found · 7 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-14.

Investigate 7 open evidence questions
  1. Data processing agreement

    Please share the current data processing agreement for the product and plan we are considering, including its annexes and signing process.

    Inspect this check
  2. Data location stated

    Which locations apply to our primary data, backups and support access? Which region can we select for this plan?

    Inspect this check
  3. Status page with history

    Where can we review incident history for the service we will use, and how do we subscribe to incident updates?

    Inspect this check
  4. HTTPS enforced with HSTS

    How is HTTPS enforced on the product and sign-in domains we will use? Please distinguish those domains from the public website.

    Inspect this check
  5. No third-party tracking before consent

    Which third-party requests occur before a visitor makes a choice, and for what purpose? Please distinguish the public website from the product.

    Inspect this check
  6. security.txt (RFC 9116)

    Where should we report a vulnerability, and what acknowledgement and follow-up process should we expect?

    Inspect this check
  7. Notice before subprocessors change

    How will you notify us before a subprocessor changes, with how much notice, and what response options apply to our contract?

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.