SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Prisma

Other Data warehouses and databases vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Prisma. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 41 that differ from Prisma on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Prisma has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Prisma” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at PrismaFound at Prisma, not found there
Aivenaiven.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Aiven 78/100 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Supabasesupabase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Supabase 70/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Snowflakesnowflake.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Snowflake 65/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
SurrealDBsurrealdb.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SurrealDB 65/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Neonneon.techSee also Transparency alternatives to Neon 61/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Tiger Datatigerdata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tiger Data 61/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Weaviateweaviate.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Weaviate 61/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact Compare
Dremiodremio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dremio 57/100 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Redisredis.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Redis 52/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
SingleStoresinglestore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SingleStore 39/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 Compare
DoubleClouddouble.cloudSee also Transparency alternatives to DoubleCloud 35/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 Compare
Materializematerialize.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Materialize 35/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.