Alternatives to Prisma
Other Data warehouses and databases vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Prisma does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 36 that differ from Prisma on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Prisma has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Prisma does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Prisma does not | Prisma publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aivenaiven.io | 78/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Supabasesupabase.com | 78/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Timescaletimescale.com | 74/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| SurrealDBsurrealdb.com | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Tinybirdtinybird.co | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| ScyllaDBscylladb.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Databricksdatabricks.com | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| InfluxDatainfluxdata.com | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Neonneon.tech | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Redisredis.io | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| PlanetScaleplanetscale.com | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Snowflakesnowflake.com | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.