Transparency alternatives to Weaviate
Other Data warehouses and databases vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Weaviate. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 41 that differ from Weaviate on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Weaviate has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Weaviate” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Weaviate | Found at Weaviate, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snowflakesnowflake.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Snowflake | 65/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Aivenaiven.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Aiven | 78/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Tiger Datatigerdata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tiger Data | 74/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Supabasesupabase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Supabase | 70/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Prismaprisma.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Prisma | 65/100 | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Redisredis.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Redis | 65/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Dremiodremio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dremio | 57/100 | 3 Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| SurrealDBsurrealdb.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SurrealDB | 65/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Neonneon.techSee also Transparency alternatives to Neon | 57/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| MongoDB Atlasmongodb.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MongoDB Atlas | 50/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Databricksdatabricks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Databricks | 48/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Crunchy Datacrunchydata.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crunchy Data | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.