SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to StarRocks

Other Data warehouses and databases vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that StarRocks does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 41 that differ from StarRocks on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

StarRocks has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and StarRocks does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and StarRocks does notStarRocks publishes, and they do not
Supabasesupabase.com 78/100 9 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +6 nothing Compare
Aivenaiven.io 78/100 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 nothing Compare
SurrealDBsurrealdb.com 65/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +4 nothing Compare
Neonneon.tech 61/100 7 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 nothing Compare
Tiger Datatigerdata.com 61/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +4 nothing Compare
Weaviateweaviate.io 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Redisredis.io 52/100 6 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Snowflakesnowflake.com 52/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
MongoDB Atlasmongodb.com 50/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
InfluxDatainfluxdata.com 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Tinybirdtinybird.co 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Databricksdatabricks.com 48/100 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.