Transparency alternatives to DueTrail
Other Debt collection software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at DueTrail. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 41 that differ from DueTrail on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
DueTrail has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at DueTrail” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at DueTrail | Found at DueTrail, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tesoriotesorio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tesorio | 74/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Gavitigaviti.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gaviti | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Billtrustbilltrust.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Billtrust | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Highradiushighradius.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Highradius | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Upflowupflow.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Upflow | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| InDebtedindebted.coSee also Transparency alternatives to InDebted | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Chaserchaserhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chaser | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Intrumintrum.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intrum | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Florettryfloret.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Floret | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
| Paystandpaystand.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Paystand | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
| Cervedcerved.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cerved | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
| Versapayversapay.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Versapay | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.