Transparency alternatives to Gaviti
Other Debt collection software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Gaviti. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 41 that differ from Gaviti on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Gaviti has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Gaviti” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Gaviti | Found at Gaviti, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tesoriotesorio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tesorio | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| DueTrailduetrail.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DueTrail | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Billtrustbilltrust.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Billtrust | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Upflowupflow.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Upflow | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Highradiushighradius.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Highradius | 39/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Atradius Collectionsatradiuscollections.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Atradius Collections | 26/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Cervedcerved.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cerved | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Versapayversapay.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Versapay | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Chaserchaserhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chaser | 26/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Intrumintrum.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intrum | 26/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Florettryfloret.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Floret | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Satagosatago.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Satago | 22/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.