Transparency alternatives to Upflow
Other Debt collection software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Upflow. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 41 that differ from Upflow on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Upflow has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Upflow” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Upflow | Found at Upflow, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tesoriotesorio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tesorio | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| DueTrailduetrail.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DueTrail | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Gavitigaviti.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gaviti | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Billtrustbilltrust.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Billtrust | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| InDebtedindebted.coSee also Transparency alternatives to InDebted | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Highradiushighradius.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Highradius | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Atradius Collectionsatradiuscollections.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Atradius Collections | 26/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Chaserchaserhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chaser | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Intrumintrum.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intrum | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Florettryfloret.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Floret | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Satagosatago.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Satago | 22/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | Compare |
| Axactoraxactor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Axactor | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.