Transparency alternatives to ZeroLight
Other Design and prototyping vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ZeroLight does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from ZeroLight on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ZeroLight has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and ZeroLight does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and ZeroLight does not | ZeroLight publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recraftrecraft.ai | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Photoroomphotoroom.com | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Splinespline.design | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| PicMonkeypicmonkey.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Animaanimaapp.com | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Pencilpencil.dev | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| UXPinuxpin.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Erasereraser.io | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Supernovasupernova.io | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kittlkittl.com | 13/100 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Infograminfogram.com | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Specifyspecifyapp.com | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.