Transparency alternatives to BuildBuddy
Other Developer collaboration and CI vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that BuildBuddy does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 54 that differ from BuildBuddy on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
BuildBuddy has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and BuildBuddy does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and BuildBuddy does not | BuildBuddy publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terramateterramate.io | 74/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| CodeRabbitcoderabbit.ai | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Replitreplit.com | 71/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CircleCIcircleci.com | 61/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Daytonadaytona.io | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| GitHubgithub.com | 57/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Warpwarp.dev | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Namespacenamespace.so | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Onaona.com | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Retriumretrium.com | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Bitbucket Cloudbitbucket.org | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Codercoder.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.