SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to E2B

Other Developer collaboration and CI vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that E2B does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 52 that differ from E2B on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

E2B has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and E2B does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and E2B does notE2B publishes, and they do not
Terramateterramate.io 74/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 1 Certifications named Compare
CodeRabbitcoderabbit.ai 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 nothing Compare
Warpwarp.dev 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
CircleCIcircleci.com 61/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 1 Data location stated Compare
GitHubgithub.com 57/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Replitreplit.com 71/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Certifications named Compare
Daytonadaytona.io 61/100 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Namespacenamespace.so 52/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Certifications named Compare
Onaona.com 52/100 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Retriumretrium.com 48/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Aviatoraviator.co 35/100 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Depotdepot.dev 35/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.