Transparency alternatives to Probo.CI
Other Developer collaboration and CI vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Probo.CI does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 54 that differ from Probo.CI on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Probo.CI has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Probo.CI does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Probo.CI does not | Probo.CI publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CodeRabbitcoderabbit.ai | 70/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +5 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Terramateterramate.io | 74/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| CircleCIcircleci.com | 61/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Daytonadaytona.io | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Replitreplit.com | 71/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Warpwarp.dev | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| GitHubgithub.com | 57/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Onaona.com | 52/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Namespacenamespace.so | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Retriumretrium.com | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Codacycodacy.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Codercoder.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.